+1 
Norman

Am Freitag, den 01.09.2006, 09:18 +0200 schrieb Vincenzo Gianferrari
Pini:
> +1
> 
> Vincenzo
> 
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> 
> >I am still wanting to wait a few days to be sure, but in the meantime, we
> >might as well vote in anticipation that there is no further problem.
> >
> >Since JAMES v2.3.0RC2, there have been the following changes:
> >
> > 1) UPGRADE.txt was added
> > 2) default.properties changed to 2.3.0 from 2.3.0rc2
> > 3) phoenix.sh had a redundant $JVM_OPTS removed.
> > 4) LogMessage mailet had an incorrect initialization fixed
> > 5) Several edits to the web site/docs.
> > 6) build.xml changed to include UPGRADE.txt
> >
> >I am provisionally +1, with the remaining caveat of wanting to make sure
> >that I don't still have the memory leak.
> >
> >Accordingly, I propose to tag, build, sign and upload JAMES 2.3.0 subsequent
> >to the successful vote of the PMC.
> >
> >Rather than conflate two issues, I'll start a separate thread on v2.4 later.
> >
> >     --- Noel
> >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> !EXCUBATOR:1,44f7def045112110981422!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil



Reply via email to