Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> I'm refer to any general idea of using JavaMail for local storage.
> Shouldn't this discussion be supported by benchmarks?
See the various analysis of JavaMail done by ... IIRC ... Jason Webb from years
ago after I suggested using JavaMail in the first place.
The other important thing is that we stop using JavaMail internally unless we
need to manipulate the contents of the message. MIME4J will be faster, more
reliable in the face of a real-world corpus (doesn't throw exceptions "all the
time", unlike JavaMail), and has a smaller footprint.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
