Jürgen Hoffmann schrieb:
Hi Noel,
Noel J. Bergman schrieb:
And another Handler, which allows common Bendings of the RFC.
Can you elaborate? Would this be the handler with switches to do
things like fix bogus addresses that lack brackets?
yes, this would be the handler that accepts those common violations to
the RFC. Starting with the missing brackets. Others will probably
follow. We ourselves have problems that some Backup Reporting bla
program sends malformed messages, which passed through qmail nicely
but are rejected by james. Norman has more information on why the Mail
is rejected.
Moi ? Just jokin.. It is "corrupted" caused by a missing Content-Transfer
Another question I have is, why are you against an example inside the
configuration file, which is commented out by default?
I as a Systems Administrator always like well documented Configuration
Files over Well Documentation. Although good Documentation is a MUST,
I learn how to use the software by reading the config file first.
But in the End I have nothing against leaving the configuration
comment out of the config file. I was just curious.
Kind regards
Juergen Hoffmann
We could also ship 2 config files. One which is simple and only do
neccessary stuff and one complex with many examples etc.
bye
Norman
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
