Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Norman Maurer wrote:
> > First off all i want to create and VirtualUserTable service
> > At the moment i created the XMLVirtualUserTable and
> > JDBCVirtualUserTable as implementations.
> +1
> We should also make the DefaultJamesUsersRepository to implement this
> new service so that we could remove the "AliasingForwarding" mailet
> and only keep the VUT service.
Agreed, as we did back in May 2006 (see e-mail archives). I figure that
Norman is getting around to working on what we all discussed back then.
HOWEVER ...
> > The second step ( and the harder step) is to make it manageable. This
> > is only the case for JDBCVirtualUserTable at the moment. I want to add
> > JMX and RemoteManager support for it to create mappings and delete them.
> +1
Yes, BUT ... this should have some more careful designing. And we do not
need to rush it. For example, UsersRepositoryVUT should be a higher
priority (IMO), and it already has an administrative interface.
> I think we should introduce a store for VUTs so we can have multiple
> VUTs or otherwise also keep the current mailets.
I don't believe that you mean a "store", and if you do, I probably disagree.
I do agree that we could define the VUTs separately from their caller, and
reference them by name, which is what I believe you mean.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
