Serge Knystautas wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > See the final paragraph of that page. People get a
> bit "rule happy", and that's never good.
> You did not make your point but argued about the rules,
> so you were being just as "rule happy" as Stefano.
Actually, I wasn't referring to Stefano at all. It was a generic comment
about something that is rather common, and why not everything is always
spelled out. Avalon suffered from it constantly, and a would normally be my
exemplar, not Stefano. Being rule happy isn't an issue I've had with
Stefano.
> Can we just discuss the underlying issue?
I wasn't really raising one. I had thought about it, but it wasn't really
worth raising. I was simply trying to point out that there really isn't a
final result for this sort of thing because a change can always be vetoed in
the future. And that is a solution to the generic problem to which you
refer.
FWIW, I do review every commit notice, at least cursorily, and sometimes in
more detail. I just don't always comment about it unless I notice something
worth commenting upon. I might, of course, miss something.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
