Stefano Bagnara schrieb: > Joachim raeger wrote: >> Am Freitag, den 27.10.2006, 20:45 +0200 schrieb Bernd Fondermann: >> >>>> BTW: if everything runs well with Spring, which advantages brings us >>>> staying with phoenix, apart from backward compatibility with custom >>>> code? >>> + everyone in the dev team knows Avalon/Phoenix >>> + it is proven to run James components in a stable production-ready >>> manner (we don't know yet which Spring-related and >>> not-running-in-Phoenix-related problems we will run into. this would >>> be the first painless migration in my career. >> >> :-) >> >>> + we still support Java 1.4, we should continue to support Phoenix >> >> I completely agree. But we can keep in mind that this are all "soft" or >> maybe non-functional arguments. I mean there is no important feature of >> phoenix currently missing in spring. >> >> Joachim > > I don't use it, but phoenix has an optional Beanshell based kernel > that you can access with a console to manage the container and the > contained applications dynamically. > > Phoenix has an HTTP adaptor on the ServiceManager that should allow > you to access the JMX services via web: we never really used this, but > this is in phoenix. > > Phoenix supports autodeployment of new sar copied in the folder. > > Phoenix supports classloader isolations between multiple applications > deployed inside it: I, as an example, have one single phoenix where I > deploy 3 different james instances. > > Phoenix has some support to use RMI to control the behaviours of the > container (not sure anyone out-there is using this). > > We (Norman) wrote a phoenix-daemon-loader that allow us to bind > "<1024" ports under unix and switch to an unpriviledged user: we would > have to write something similar for spring. > > I don't know if spring provide any or multiple of this: This is to say > that there is not too much that keep us from going away, but there is > not too much that we gain leaving phoenix. > > Stefano
Im not familar with spring. Thats why i have not strong idea about it. But after a quick search on the internet it seems there is no "commons daemon" wrapper. But it whould be cool to maybe offer a phoenix and a spring bundle ;-) bye Norman --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
