Danny Angus wrote:
Guys,
Standing up for Stefano here..
On 11/4/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry I don't understand this message. I understood we defined the
following:
2.3.1 - bug fix release: we simply fix bugs in v2.3 branch and will
release something if needed (the unbounded cache and the connection
accepting problem are good candidate to decide we need it).
next-minor: the release you said you want to work and that will be based
on 2.3 branch (but not the 2.3 branch itself) and you want to backport
things from trunk (to be released in 1-2 months).
next-major: the release we are currently preparing on trunk and that
we'll branch soon (in 1-2 months).
This is (or should be) reflected in the STATUS file.
(yeah STATUS file!)
d.
I just updated it.
Don't know what others think, but I have a few workflow problems working
on the STATUS file (I would prefer, for example, a wiki page).
I would like to hear what other committers think about this, as I would
not like to be the only one updating it: I'm not the owner of any open
branch, but I just updated it to include some of them.
I personally don't need a status file because I spend already so much
time on this project that it is more probable I forgot my name than the
status of the project, and I currently feel I'm updating it to make
Danny happy...
I really have problems deciding what to write there and what to not
write there. I would write there every message I wrote in the "roadmaps"
threads but this would make it unreadable... so I don't write much...
That said I will update it when you'll write "this should be in the
status file" ;-) . And maybe you can do this for a while so I learn.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
