On 11/8/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> spring-integration
> + Goal: run James Server using Spring Framework instead of
Phoenix/Avalon
> Status: completed prototype
> - Owner: bernd
> + Owner: berndf
Hi Bernd,
Bravo! I agree that "goal" is important there.
As you probably noticed I marked the status of "spring-integration" as
"completed prototype".
This is fine.
I see that you marked JAMES-665 as Fixed.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-665
Shouldn't we include something in our distribution to declare it fixed?
I don't get your question, sorry. What do you mean with "distribution"?
Have you already plan for this or should we consider this branch
"closed", as is, until someone will revamp the issue?
I am still working on it, especially an ant script would be important.
But also integration with other applications.
What do you think? Is it feasible to add something to our ant build that
automatically create the spring-ready distribution?
As you can imagine I am not opposing this. But let us wait some weeks
until I (or others) have done more work on it. Especially more
extensive testing. Then we will for sure have some discussion around
this.
We should avoid to mantain 2 "assembly" files (phoenix + spring) and
maybe we should better create one from the other, or create a common
source for both.
There was some trial and error and trick to make the spring-config
fit. But yes, it would be cool to have something like that. I will
have a check.
Bernd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
