Danny Angus wrote: > > > On 11/8/06, Steve Brewin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <snip/> > first of all I would be opposed to using a wiki page as a record of > project management decisions like the STATUS file because the role of > this file is understood and requires a formal statement and svn is > auditable and strictly controlled. Any other documents would simply be > reporting or expressing opinion, the STATUS file is a formal record. > If we agree that there is a requirement for more structure to our > activilty post-decison making to avoid the same points being discussed > endlessly with no outcome then the Apache Way for this is to use the > STATUS file.
I thought you would say something like this! As things stand, you are right. It is rather retro technology, but I guess its technology all committers are equipped with in order to deliver to their work. I'm sure we could advance the technology if we chose to, but right now what's important is delivering the STATUS file. Looking at the commits, I see we are beginning to. Cool! <snip/> Cheers -- Steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
