Hi Stefano, Am Dienstag, den 14.11.2006, 14:06 +0100 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > Sorry to you, I don't think *you* started the flame, I think we all > started a discussion that doesn't worth the time (imho).
IMO the discussion was worth the time. For me it was not obvious why you insist so strong on passing tests in svn. I don't deny that it is a common practice in OS projects. I have the feeling that I made a mistake by throwing in my ideas to testing, at a time, where the discussion has already heated up. That's why some opinions may have been mixed up. > If after this full thread someone feel this is not a good practice (and > feel others think the same) just make a proposal to be voted. I don't see a consensus for this. I know understand your (Bernd and Stefano) thinking. I have a different opinion in some points but I don't think it is worth to begin a crucial vote on this. Maybe I find some good solutions and can make a proposal everyone feels comfortable with. (This is the first goal) Until we have another solution (tool/workflow) I agree on the current practice: Don't accept failing tests in svn. Joachim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
