Noel J. Bergman schrieb: > Stefano Bagnara wrote: > > >> Cool! I'm happy to know there are others committer testing unreleased >> code and helping in the hard consolidation process. >> > > You must be misunderstanding. I am running v2.3 plus just a couple of vital > fixes that you blocked. I do wonder if whom else amongst us *other than me* > is actually running a stock JAMES distribution in production on Internet > accessible servers. > >
I run at least about 8 Servers.. We just add some costum mailets to the stock install + the property to the run script. >> NO, please, don't change v2.3 branch before discussing what you want to >> do. And the "[VOTE] Using of 2.3 branch" thread is waiting for your vote >> as the first step trying to solve this issue. >> > > I am as likely to resign from JAMES as I am to participate in continued > discussions on these threads. > > --- Noel > > > Please... what the problem with the thread (VOTE) ? Why you not just cast your vote ? I just want to know how others feel about it, thats why i start the vote. What's the problem with doing feature backport to "next-minor" branch (when created) and only bugfixing in 2.3.1 (2.3 branch). I still not get this. bye Norman --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
