On 12/31/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tom Brown wrote: > I have submitted the code via JIRA. I believe it's issue #12359570. > > Tom
<snip>
3) I don't know the DK specification: is it fully supported by this code? or is it a partial implementation?
does Yahoo! have a compliance test suite? <snip>
PS: Robert, is this work somehow related to the reorganization of crypto code (SMIME/PGP) discussed here http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-596 ?
related, yes but indirectly SMIME and OpenPGP/SMIME are very similar structurally - the major difference is in the keying. OpenPGP/clearsign is easier and does not involve MIME so differs structurally. the specification links from the Yahoo! page seem to be broken so i can only go from the code. at first glance, it appears structurally different from each of the other areas. but it might be powerful to have some signing/verification abstraction so that further processing could happen regardless of what technology was used. i'm very keen on domain specific languages, meta data and rules engines for email (so that'd probably be good enough for me) but perhaps james would benefit from pluggable signers and verifiers.... BTW i have most of the most difficult work done on OpenPGP/SMIME but i'm not sure when i'll find time to get back and finish it. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]