On 1/4/07, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/4/07, Joachim Draeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree with everything you say, particularly about dialogue. I think
Noel's original comment was only meant to highlight the fact that this
dialogue should be public.
James might be held back if we make it difficult for people to
innovate, but it will die for sure if we don't maintain openness and
the oversight of the community.
There are two sides to this and we need to strike a balance, being an
ASF project means that we can't just do what we want, there are ways
in which we are expected to behave, and the reason for this is to
ensure that we have a sustainable community with proper oversight,
auditable decision making, and legal protection for the commiters.
+1 to both Danny and Joachim's points.
--
Serge Knystautas
Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com
p. 301.656.5501
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
