robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > It might make sense to revisit some of it using JCA, but we have very
> > specific needs, and an overly general approach of reusing JEE is not
likely
> > to give us the performance that we need.
> the use case i was thinking about was a JEE application requiring deep
> email integration
You need to elaborate.
> running james in container using JCA for integration with the JEE
> application should be more performant than the application using
> existing protocols to communicate via sockets. it would also be more
> flexible.
More performant for what? For the JEE app, or for the mainstream JAMES
server which needs to get faster, not slower.
> for james, JCA would just be another protocol to support
Not quite. For one thing, JCA isn't a protocol. But your goal is
comparable.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
