On 3/13/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin ha scritto: > On 3/13/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
<snip>
>> This is orthogonal for having the blob be in a >> separate table. The latter allows us improved DB performance (and >> sharing >> of the blob, if that were ever useful). > > AFACT message_body contains the body as a blob (but performance is still > poor) > > - robert How did you measure this performance?
it's not properly benchmarked, just general usage with timings
In my tests the dbonly solution has always been the faster in a typical scenario (I know every case is different, but messages greater than 20k are less than 1% on my systems).
ever used nio for file -> socket? - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
