Danny Angus schrieb: > On 4/17/07, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> 1. We tried to fetch emails via POP3 from a Exchange 2003 server which >> Should it not just use >> "127.0.0.1" and not try to parse it ? > > Depends upon whether or not doing that would provide a "cloak" for > spam. I suppose you could.
Maybe we should make it configurable ? But for me its not clear from the config explaination that it will fail on such messages. BTW, non RFC-conform messages are unfortanally not only created by spammers. Often its created by well known commercial products. So why not just fetch it and take care about this in the mailet chain ? > >> 2. > ... Thats not acceptable for me. >> James should just "ignore" this message and proccess. > > I agree 100% I think I put (and fixed) this bug in the original fetchpop. Can you check if the fix is aviable in fetchmail too ? Maybe you can point me to the original bug ? > > d. bye Norman --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
