Jukka Zitting ha scritto: > Hi, > > On 5/3/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Unfortunately, even in you find a pom.xml in the James SERVER root, >> James SERVER is not a maven2 application. We use ant/build.xml to >> build the application. The pom is there mainly for the website >> generation. > > It would still be cool to have the artifacts on the repository even if > you don't use Maven internally as the build environment. Even the > javamail artifacts are available on the repository.
Yes, the answer to this is the NOTICE/LICENSE issue and the fact that we never had an official VOTE to release a jar package for JAMES Server. So it is not only a matter of gpg signing, adding a pom and submit the package to the repository: we should first VOTE to release the JARs alone. I think this is indeed a good idea: can you please add a JIRA issue, so that at least we will remember this for the next release? Thank you, Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
