I would prefer to have a single distribution including stable and experimental modules. Experimental modules are disabled by default.
I think we should not complicate our workflow with multiple different distributions: we are already too slow even with a single distribution, we should first become more agile with that one and then we could evaluate about having multiple distributions. KISS Stefano Danny Angus ha scritto: > On 5/9/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> so, i would like to propose we allow experimental modules in trunk. > > We could even have an "experimental" or "technology preview" distribution. > I like this idea a lot, a whole big lot. > > I don't think we should prefix the names, but perhaps we could find > some other means of identifying experimental modules, perhaps using > messages on the startup screen and in the build. E.G.: > > James Mail Server next-major > EXPERIMENTAL MailboxManager has been initialized > Remote Manager Service started plain:4555 > EXPERIMENTAL IMAP Service started plain:10143 > POP3 Service started plain:110 > etc... > > and ... > > ant -Dinclude=experimental dist > or > ant -Dinclude=stable dist > > WDYT? > > d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
