On 7/31/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: > >> [X] +1 Dub trunk 'JAMES 3.0' > > > > +1 for JAMES Server 3.0 -SNAPSHOT (or -dev). > > > > JAMES is the project name > > Server is the product name > > 3.0 will be a final/stable release. -dev or -SNAPSHOT (I prefer the > > -SNAPSHOT) is more appropriate for nightly builds/snapshots. M1 or A1 > > (in 2.x we used the A1, A2, B1, B2, RC1... as suffixes) could be the > > suffix of the first public milestone/alpha release. > > To be more clear my +1 is to have the first 3.0 milestones/alphas cut > from trunk. I'm not, currently, agreeing on releasing 3.0 RCs and final > from trunk (unless there is clear proof this won't slow down any other > non 3.0 related activity).
no vote at apache really commits anyone to anything other than the immediate action. the future will look after itself in due course. so, there's no need to commit to anything other than agreeing that 3.0 is a better label for trunk than next-major > My opinion is that sooner or later the 3.0 release process will require > stabilization/consolidation and a branch will better fit the goal so to > leave trunk open to innovation and new features. probably but there's no need to take that decision now > It is really difficult to tell now when a branch will be needed as "3.0" > is only a label (as "next-major" was), but, if I don't miss anything, it > does not have a specification yet (backward compatibility level > required, JVM dependency...) yes - my proposal is simply to change the label for trunk from next-major to 3.0 - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
