On 8/8/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > > On 8/5/07, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Am Sonntag, den 05.08.2007, 16:04 +0200 schrieb Bernd Fondermann: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Made some progress over the last days with the spring-deployment module. > >>> I am currently working on making it ready to be run without further > >>> adjustments after checkout and fit into the trunk infrastructure. > >>> > >>> There are still some tweaks I have here locally. But in general the > >>> module is able to boot up James Server quite nicely. > >>> > >>> When ready, the module could simply be copied to a trunk checkout and be > >>> run from there, or, after appropriate DISCUSS and successful VOTE, even > >>> be moved to trunk as an experimental deployment. > > > > IMHO CTR should be fine for experimental modules > > +1 For me it's easier to review code already committed than trying the > merge on my side in order to have a preview of what we are discussing > about/voting about. > So CTR would be a win-win.
I like the idea of ratifying by a vote the facts of introducing new dependencies (spring.jar, maybe others) on TRUNK and having other (experimental) deployments than pure Avalon. Simply to avoid the "late veto" we had around here where changes where introduced by CTR without raising any vetos at first and then later that code was "vetoed-for-a-release", but was permitted to stay in TRUNK. Bernd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
