[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: > Author: rdonkin > Date: Wed Aug 8 14:14:09 2007 > New Revision: 564023
> -version=next-major > +version=3.0 My vote was a +1 for 3.0-dev or better 3.0-SNAPSHOT (as I wrote it as a response to the vote): some other committers thought the same while voting +1 to that vote or I am the only one with the following problem: 3.0 IMHO is misleading and it creates confusion to users that find randomly artifacts [1] on the web (see the current thread about the 2 years old JAMES 3.0a an user found on a maven repository). [1] http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/bin/ Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
