[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12538207
 ] 

Robert Burrell Donkin commented on JAMES-808:
---------------------------------------------

#1 Mailbox is not an IMAP backend but is intended to be a general Mail backend. 
This has advantages (the JSieve filtering is cool) and  disadvantages (the 
current API sucks for IMAP) but this is a collective use case decision made by 
the JAMES team. That's why I suggested moving this discussion to the list. 

When I started to work on the IMAP implementation, I definitely felt that this 
restriction would limit the ability to create a usable IMAP implementation. 
Now, I think that it is possible though the price is some increased complexity 
and much more opaque design.

Understanding the structure of a mail without loading it completely is a 
reasonable general requirement. MessageResults could expose the general 
structure (allowing BODYSTRUCTURE etc) as objects without just caching the IMAP 
specific string value. 


> Fetch command is not very efficient
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JAMES-808
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-808
>             Project: James
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: IMAPServer
>    Affects Versions: Trunk
>            Reporter: Zsombor Gegesy
>            Assignee: Robert Burrell Donkin
>             Fix For: Trunk
>
>         Attachments: opt.patch
>
>
> Currently the implementation of the FETCH command is not very efficient. For 
> example to retrieve one mail the following conversions will happens:
>  1, the backend creates a MimeMessage from a file/database blob/thin air/etc
>  2, the frontend converts into a byte array, with correct CRLF line endings. 
> (I don't get, why it's needed, every incoming MimeMessage is already in this 
> format, isn't it ?)
>  3, the frontend appends it into a StringBuffer in the FetchCommand class
>  4, after some String manipulation it gets sent over an InternetPrintWriter 
> which checks also that all line endings in correct style.
>  I'm not sure that the whole thing is absolutly necessary. There is two other 
> problem with the current code : 
>  1, it doesn't calculate the correct MessageResult flags, so the backend cant 
> optimize out the unnecessary things.
>  2,  It doesn't parse the BODY[]<0.1024> style commands. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to