On Nov 30, 2007 7:22 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since I expect to have time at the end of the year, I intend to branch from > the last known good release and prepare a release build with at least a few > fixes. > > On my list are: > > - fixing the long standing memory leak so that I can actually > use JAMES from JAMES again, and not a private build; > - incorporating per-IP connection limiting -- again, so that > I can drop my private version;
+1. > -> - looking at trunk to see if there is anything salvagable and > simple enough to do in the timeframe. This kind of makes we wondering why you are repeatedly proposing to dump TRUNK, but anyway, +1, for the general approach to backport small changes, but we'd have to look at every one of them separately. (BTW, I am NOT proposing to get rid of TRUNK. Whenever I said something like that it was a _joke_, and _only_ a joke.) > possibly changing the database structure to move the message > body into a separate table; Doesn't sound like a DB schema change qualifies for a dot-Release. How do you intend to handle migration? Also, this requires heavy testing. I'd prefer if this goes into a later release. Bernd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
