Hi all, I just saw this on the ietf list. If anyone have specific suggestions about #3,#4 and #5 please speak now, so we can send a single report before december the 10th.
Stefano > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dave Crocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Newsgroups: gmane.ietf.general > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "MAAWG technical" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 5:30 PM > Subject: RFC2821 Implementation Survey > > > > Greetings. > > > > The IETF will shortly be considering elevating the revised SMTP > > specification > > RFC 2821, to the second-level standards status of DRAFT. > > > > A requirement for this is to produce information about implementations of > > the > > protocol specification. It is therefore essential that we assemble a > > credible > > collection of information about actual development and interoperability > > testing -- and deployment is a form of testing -- for RFC 2821. > > > > Because SMTP is a rich and widely-deployed protocol, the goal of this query > > is > > to ask for enough information to be useful, but not to place undue burden on > > responders by asking them to do a massive checklist. > > > > It is assumed that most implementations of RFC 2821 have implemented all of > > its required (MUST) features and probably a fair number of its optional > > (SHOULD or MAY) features. > > > > This survey does NOT cover any specifications outside of the RFC2821 > > document > > itself. No enhancements, options, or the like. > > > > Please take some time to complete the following questionnaire and send me a > > private note with your responses. I will assemble them into a public > > report: > > > > Please respond by 10 December 2007. > > > > > > > > RFC 2821 Implementation Questionnaire > > ===================================== > > > > > > 0. Contact and Description > > > > Organization Name: > > > > Implementation (Software or Service) Name: > > > > > > 1. Have you implemented RFC2821? > > > > > > 2. For how long it has been deployed? > > > > > > 3. What features have NOT been implemented from RFC2821? > > > > > > 4. What features of RFC2821 are problematic for your implementation? > > > > > > 5. Please add any other comments you wish to share: > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > d/ > > -- > > > > Dave Crocker > > Brandenburg InternetWorking > > bbiw.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
