The problem would be most acute where the sender has misspelled a real address and the content contains personal or commercial info. Which makes anonymising the data a non-starter too :-(
On 12/19/07, Serge Knystautas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 18, 2007 4:55 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 18, 2007 9:50 PM, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Serge, is it all spam? Or real messages? I ask because 1.2m real > > > messages would be worth having, but 1.2m bits of spam is probably less > > > representative. > > > > perhaps 1.2m SPAM emails would interest spamassassin > > Yeah, I'm not sure how many are spam and how many aren't. This should > have gotten past the spam filters, but I haven't had a chance to look > through to see how many were bad recipients vs. just random email > addresses. I'll have to look through and dig into it. > > > my main issue was licensing. AIUI the legal status of emails is a grey > > area which i'd like to avoid. > > True... yeah, that is a nasty issue that you've highlighted. > > -- > Serge Knystautas > Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com > p. 301.656.5501 > e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Sent from Google Mail for mobile | mobile.google.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
