Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
> I would have preferred to vote on the actual classes to be moved there,
> because I agree that mailet-base is needed, but I don't know if we agree on
> what to move there ;-)
i don't see the point arguing about details unless the principle is
agreed. there's no real reason to vote on contents anyway: should be
able to reach a reasonable consensus
> IMO Generic*, RFC2822Headers and the "dates" package should be moved there.
+1
might also move org.apache.james.util.mailet.* from server
+1
the question is how much toolkit is worthwhile moving in as well. it
would be better if standard mailets were just a runtime dependency.
this would mean moving some abstract implementations into base:
AbstractQuotaMatcher
AbstractAddFooter
this would mean subtly changing base from pure utilities into
something a little more like a mailet-building toolkit.
opinions?
I'm a little against moving the 2 Abstract classes to mailet-base.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
