(stefano commented on my blog at http://www.jroller.com/robertburrelldonkin/entry/testing_protocols but i'd like to move it back to this list)
the reason why an independent protocol testing product isn't suitable for JAMES is not community (i think that it'd fit in very well) but scope. a micro-library for functional testing wire protocols is clearly out of scope for JAMES. it would be unusual but just about in scope for the commons. IIRC the commons sandbox has an open door policy towards committers from other projects so there wouldn't be any problem moving the community. the mailing list is high volume which might put some people off. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
