Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I created a branch to commit the code I worked on in the last 2 days.

The branch included commits to fix:

MIME4J-50 - InputBuffer to extend FilterInputStream
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-50
MIME4J-52 - Infinite loop when nested multipart is missing end boundary
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-52
MIME4J-56 - In nested multiparts outer boundaries are not recognized when
parsing inner multiparts
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-56

when the branch was mooted, AIUI the idea was to allow people to
easily understand the proposed repackaging. now it's turned into a
development branch. i'm not impressed.

sorry Robert, I opened 2 different branches.

the package reorganization branch is only demonstrative and there is another topic about it. This one instead was to let me study how to refactor the InputBuffer and to fix the related issues. I didn't do this in the main tree simply because I don't know who is working there and if people had work in progress patches, so I preferred to simply work somewhere else and to propose a merge later.

And it also include the stream renaming proposed in the thread "[mime4j]
BufferingInputStreamAdaptor =>  BufferedInputStreamFilter".

Please note that MIME4J-56 require a fix even if we don't want MIME4J-50 but
my fix depends I have not a fix for it without first applying MIME4J-50, so
this is why I'm proposing this "merge" instead of single patches.

I'd like to merge the work from this branch to trunk and to remove the
branch ASAP as we also have a bunch of new critical bugs to be fixed in
trunk before we can try a release.

right or wrong, please merge it now

Robert, can you explain me what's wrong with me having created a branch for the stream-refactoring? I'm not sure I understand the issue and I don't want to make the same mistake in future.

Stefano

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to