On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 21:34, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefano Bagnara wrote: > >> The current process is a simple nighly build [that] is good >> for the nighlies, but I think I don't have to explain the >> difference between a real CI environment and a nighly build script. > > That is correct. We have a CI at the ASF. The nightly wasn't intended to > replace it. However ... > >> The specific issue I was recording in this message was the inability to >> know what exact test failed (we have only summaries for each test class). > > The entire build log is posted to the build site. It seems to me that if > you want more detail, just enhance the build. The nightly process is just a > shell script that runs the build, generates the e-mail summary, and uploads > the build artifacts with full log. > > Is there something you want that can't be done via the above? > >> > Ubuntu 7.10. > >> JVM used? (IIRC it didn't find the Java 1.4 issues, so I thought it was >> 1.5, but if you tell us the specific version it will be helpful) >> JVM parameters used by ant. > > I don't recall if it is Java 5 or 6, and freakishly, I don't have access to > it right now. I need to fix the SSH connection back through my firewall > when I get home. Right now it is on autopilot. > >> > We've talked about having a JAMES zone for testing. Of course, you were >> > against it the last time, apparently for the sole reason that I > suggested >> > it. > >> I've never been against this. You may have misunderstood me. > > LOL Actually, you're right -- I went back and cbecked. It is always you who > disagrees, but in this case it was BERND! LOL OK, I apologize. :-)
I supported this, too. I volontered to aquire, admin and donate a domain for it. But the proposal never kicked off, so I didn't do it. Should I do so, now? Bernd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
