On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 7:47 AM, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 23:48, Robert Burrell Donkin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Robert Burrell Donkin schrieb: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> We need to start eating our own dogfood, at least kind of. Otherwise, we >>>>> will never release any Mail Server again. :-) Soooo... >>>>> >>>>> I am planning to set up a dedicated server for testing James Server >>>>> running >>>>> under the domain james-testing.de . >>>>> >>>>> It will be a virtual server with nothing else running than a current >>>>> off-the-trunk spring-deployment-flavored James. The OS will probably be >>>>> Debian Etch, heap will be under 1 GB (sorry for that). >>>>> >>>>> I want this server to be accessible by all interested Server committers, >>>>> so >>>>> providing shell logins is definitively planned. >>>>> >>>>> To make this right, I need your input about how the Server and James in >>>>> particular should be configured concerning: >>>>> >>>>> + DNS >>>>> + JDK (1.6? Harmony?) >>>>> + java runtime properties/diagnostics >>>>> + James Server config >>>>> + Server Backend (dbfile or something else?) >>>>> Note: I am not a big mySql fan, but could run it regardlessly >>>>> >>>>> If this is all going well and nobody objects, I would check the >>>>> configuration into svn. >>>>> >>>>> Then, when at some point we get a zone at the ASF, we could run a more >>>>> conservative setup there and an alternative setup on james-testing.de, or >>>>> whatever we come up with. >>>>> >>>>> WDYT? >>>>> >>>> >>>> sounds great :-) >>>> >>>> i would recommend not running IMAP ATM >>>> >>>> - robert >>>> >>> >>> Why not just requesting a zone for it ? I think hosting this on ASF Hardware >>> is preferable .. >>> I can handle the zone creation for us. Does it work for the others ? >> >> having a zone would be great > > +1 > > but additional resources won't hurt either.
+1 >> having a box on non-ASF hardware would also be useful for honey trapping > > yes, or more experimental setups. +1 i would like to see the apache zone targetted at verifying the JAMES server product 3.0 as it's intended to be shipped. > But I am all +1 for the zone. +1 - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
