(as can be seen at http://james.apache.org/mailet/base/apidocs/index.html) base mailet has quite a lot of packages for such a small library. they also seem quite messy - and so unlikely to play well with OSGi (for example).
perhaps we should take this opportunity to rationalise into a single package ATM we have org.apache.james.util.mailet org.apache.mailet org.apache.mailet.dates i can see an argument for org.apache.mailet.base but there perhaps org.apache.mailet should be reserved just for the API. in which case org.apache.james.mailet.base might be better. opinions? - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
