Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > ATM the cryptographic mailet code is packaged into: > > * org.apache.james.security > (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mailet/crypto/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/security/) > * org.apache.james.transport.mailets.smime > (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mailet/crypto/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets/smime/) > * org.apache.james.transport.matchers.smime > (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mailet/crypto/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/transport/matchers/smime/) > > i was wondering about repackaging > > basing on 'org.apache.mailet.crypto' would follow the tentative > convention adopted in base mailets but i'm open to suggestions > > opinions?
I'm fine with repackaging, but we should remember that this will mean that we need many <mailetpackages>/<matcherpackages> in our config, and that we won't provide backward compatibility for config.xml unless we add some hardcoded hack or we add a compatibility layer with matchers/mailets in the old places. I don't know anymore if we are still on a backward compatible config.xml or if we decided to abandon that goal. Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
