On 11/30/08, Markus Wiederkehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> it might be possible to avoid explicit synchronization by using >> AtomicInteger instead > > Sounds good but AtomicInteger is a Java 5 feature that would introduce > a dependency on backport-util-concurrent.jar in the retrotranslated > jar files. The same kind of dependency I wanted to avoid by not making > o.a.j.mime4j.message.Mode a native Java 5 enum..
Ok makes sense - robert > > Markus > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
