On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> On 12/9/08, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Sorry to were not clear.. I meaned grouping jSPF and JDKIM .. >>> >>> But yeah grouping stuff together is a great idea. >> >> I like the idea of multiple classifications. For example jDKIM might >> be classified under crypto, antispam and mailet. Pages would be >> created for crypto and antispam describing James capabilities in this >> area. > > Does this mean that classification only exists in the web and for svn > they are all at the same level? Or a main classification exists also in > svn and then additional classifications are added on the web?
just web > I find that deep nesting in svn does not help browsing/searching things > so I'm slightly toward a solution that give us a single folder in svn > and groups on the web. i'm agnostic about nesting in svn > So the toplevel menu could be changed from products to categories, in a > similar way: > > - server > - containing only the server product, maybe with optional modules in > future. > - mailet > - api > - base > - crypto > - sieve > - domainkey > - mime4j > - jsieve > - protocols > - imap > ... (more to come) > - antispam > - jspf > .... (domainkey/dkim/srs/bayes) > - proofing > - postage > - mpt > > I don't like the mix between categories and products, expecially for > mime4j and jsieve. Maybe they can be placed in a category too? Any idea? possibly scripting for jsieve not sure about mime4j - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
