[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-70?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12662669#action_12662669
]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on MIME4J-70:
---------------------------------------------
I don't think that these interfaces offer enough value to justify their
existance.
Any objections to deleting them?
> RFC Interface Design
> --------------------
>
> Key: MIME4J-70
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-70
> Project: JAMES Mime4j
> Issue Type: Task
> Affects Versions: 0.4
> Reporter: Robert Burrell Donkin
> Fix For: 0.6
>
>
> The following interfaces:
> * RFC1864ContentMD5Descriptor.java
> * RFC2045MimeDescriptor.java
> * RFC2183ContentDispositionDescriptor.java
> * RFC2557ContentLocationDescriptor.java
> * RFC3066ContentLanguageDescriptor.java
> may not be worthwhile
> See
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/james-server-dev/200807.mbox/%[email protected]%3e
> thread for more discussion.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
