On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> wrote: > Markus Wiederkehr ha scritto: >> Probably kind of a noob question: how do you usually decide whether to >> resolve or close a JIRA? > > How we do is not the best thing :-)
but we can change :-) >> I realise that closed is intended to be the final state in a workflow, >> but then what purpose serves the resolved state? Is resolved more >> likely to be reopened? > > How we should do is: "resolve" an issue as soon as a commit that is > expected to solve the issue is applied. The reporter should be expected > to confirm that it is resolved in a satisfactory way and close the > issue, or otherwise it could be closed after "a while". > >> I have also noticed that the majority of the Mime4j issues have been >> resolved (59) instead of closed (33).. Is this correct? > > Most of resolved issues in mime4j and server-dev should probably be > closed, IMO. +1 - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
