On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:05 PM, David Jencks <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I'd kind of worry that if you start using annotations you are going to be >>> building yet another wiring framework which may not be the ideal focus of >>> this project. >> >> (unfortunately) i'm not sure a consensus would be possible about >> picking a more modern approach > > I would prefer the use of an external wiring library instead of writing > our own. JAMES is complex enough to require some complex wiring and > writing our own library is not the right thing to do IMHO.
i see no hope of gaining the consensus required to pick a new container > As far as we can go there's no way to ship only container-agnostic > components. One way or another we'll have to use a container and to put > wiring/configuration there and the wiring/configuration is part of the > distribution. We have to choose a container and use its facilities. One > thing we should do is to avoid to put container stuff all around our > code, but we should not write our own container to avoid being > container-specific. my suggestion is that we develop phoenix to a point where james can easily be run on other containers. this requires the development of some james specific wiring and a micro-kernel to plugin into phoenix. the development of a new container is not necessary. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
