On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> On 5/21/09, Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip> >> 2. I don't believe that we have the development capacity at this time >> to do pure OSGi > > I agree. But you insisted that there was no consensus, so I wanted to > check our community. (apologies for hijacking that thread) > =================================================================== > I still don't know if we simply lack developers or we still lack > community behaviours, agreement, procedures, meritocracy. > =================================================================== ok >> 3.Bernd's clever spring deployment is Phoenix based. I doubt we have >> the development capacity to create a pure Spring deployment at this >> time. > > Well, it is not really phoenix based. It use spring to link avalon > components. In order to reproduce some behaviour from phoenix it uses > some phoenix library. > It is a wrapper using some library from phoenix (mainly spice > libraries), not phoenix itself. > You know better than me that much libraries from phoenix epoch branched > to generic utility libraries. Some ended in the "apache-commons", > something else to project outside apache. AIUI the avalon libraries went into excalibur, not commons > I won't consider a big issue to keep relying on some spice libraries or > other libraries from phoenix while we step forward. these libraries are well used outside james. some have already been OSGified. the rest could be. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
