[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSIEVE-56?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734180#action_12734180
]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on JSIEVE-56:
---------------------------------------------
There is no concurrent usage in JSieve. A caller might reasonably elect to
reuse the same MailAdapter, for example by sharing the same adapter across
multiple script for different users. This is unlikely to be a common use case,
and the implementor could reasonably just use a ThreadLocal to store the
context.
Give that it isn't clear which methods in the API a context may be required
for, it seems better to opt for the setter.
Unless anyone jumps in with an objection, I'll implement something along these
lines.
> Provide a way to determine if a keep action is implicit or explicit
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JSIEVE-56
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSIEVE-56
> Project: JAMES jSieve
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: JSieve (Main)
> Affects Versions: 0.3
> Reporter: Boris Burtin
>
> There's no way to distinguish an implicit keep from an explicit keep in
> jSieve 0.3. The Zimbra code needs this distinction because implicit keeps
> are affected by spam filtering and explicit keeps are not. This was possible
> in jSieve 0.2 with CommandStateManager.getInstance().isImplicitKeep(), but no
> longer possible in 0.3 after the changes for JSIEVE-26.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
