Right, btw do you already have some idea about how this will work ? I saw you already created the sandbox :)
Bye, Norman 2009/8/17 Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com>: > IMO it's not possible to bind future decisions by a past vote. at any > time, any committer can force a vote by -1'ing a particular code > change. so, any decision to use guice only really happens when the > code is committed without a -1. similarly, this vote does not mean > that committers in the future can't use some other injector or > container a try: what matters is whether the particular code changes > are -1'd or not. > > FWIW providing that there are developers willing to port james to > guice, i'm happy for them to give it a try. if it works then i'd be > happy to see trunk move to it. > > - robert > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Norman Maurer<nor...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> as stated before ( See email thread "Container/DI") I would like to >> change the current way the DI is used in JAMES. I would like to start >> a VOTE to see if others agree with using Guice for all DI stuff in the >> future. >> So here we go: >> >> [ ] +1 Move to Guice for DI >> [ ] +0 I don't care to much >> [ ] -1 No please don't use Guice >> >> Thx, >> Norman >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
