2009/9/2 Robert Burrell Donkin > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Robert Burrell > Donkin<[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Robert Burrell > > Donkin<[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Stefano Bagnara<[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Doesn't this break navigation from local stages and from > >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/site/trunk/www/index.html ? > >> > >> yes > >> > >>> Is this something broken by the newest site plugin or is there any other > >>> explaination for this change? > >> > >> the site plugin specified in the apache release pom missed up the top link > >> urls > >> > >> i wanted to be able to announce the 2.3.2 release and a stuffed up > >> site was holding this up. i'll take a look and see whether i can find > >> a better solution... > > > > upgrading to 2.0.1 doesn't work either: the URLs are screwed for the > > images as well. the website's pretty stuffed ATM. > > it's the staging that's broken for me. upgrading to 2.0.1 generates > fine for the local target but stuffs up the relative URL rewriting for > staging in a local directory :-/
ok, now I remember. I had the same issue and I always did manual copies for each subproject. > i think that the breadcrumbs at the top of the page are better as > absolute URLs but i'll switch the relative URLs back and go back to > using manual copying (rather than staging) unless anyone has any ideas > how to fix this issue... I think that until we'll remove the www folder in svn we should better make sure that the www folder is browsable so to check it before deploying, otherwise svn/site/www will loose all of its uses. FWIW I'm fine with removing svn/site/www and starting deploying to www directly with maven. I don't remember much about my site plugin investigations but I argued with it for a while. I have this list of unresolved bugs in my watches (3 of them reported by me), I just checked they are still unresolved. Not sure what is the one you are hitting now, but maybe it worth updating the issue with a comment (unlikely, but someone may notice it). Absolute URI rendered as relative URI if absolute URI related to domain of POM URI http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-159 Site generation broken with multi-module property inheritence http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-307 Maven skin / version as plugin parameters http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-234 Try and unable to resolve org.apache.maven.skins:maven-default-skin:jar:RELEASE when another skin is specified http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-228 Deployed site xml does not preserve license header (and much more) http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-289 Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
