I will add it to my todo list.. Enjoy the rest of the day;)
Bye, Norman 2009/9/6 Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Norman Maurer<[email protected]> wrote: >> Comments inline... >> >> 2009/9/6 Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]>: > > <snip> > >>> ATM those handlers which need configuration either call the >>> SMTPSession or implement Configurable. i would prefer to move away >>> from the Avalon coupling for handlers but i'm not sure the best way >>> forward. >>> >> +1 Move away from Avalon is the right choice. Why not inject a >> CommonsConfiguration object and use this as configuration. We could >> prolly build and Adapter which adapt a Avalon Configuration object to >> Commons Configuration object. So we could at least elimate any Avalon >> dependency in the handlers and hooks.. > > i'm happy with this approach (though i'd be happier for someone else > to take a look at implementing) > > probably have a ConfigurableHandler interface (or something like that) > > we probably need a InitialisationHandler interface (or something like > that) to replace the Avalon lifecycle > > BTW i'm out of time today for any more changes to james server > > - robert > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
