On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Norman Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > do you really think this worth the time ? On the other side this would > make sense in terms of be able to releasing (for example) smtpserver > as standalone "product" ( if I get it correct).
i took a look at the problem, and i think that NNTP is by far the easiest protocol to tackle. if we're serious about being able to use a decoupled subproject for SMTP then i'd much rather have the chance to try out NNTP first. then again, i'm unlikely to have a lot of time any time soon so delete if you want. an alternative solution would be the partial solution adopted by IMAP: most of the code could easily be moved elsewhere with a small quantity of binding code retained in trunk. the NNTP would just be protocol library (connection foo would be required before it would serve standalone, just like IMAP). - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
