On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Norman Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all (Robert ;) ), > > when looking at the imap trunk I see there is one Torque implentation > and one JPA (openjpa). Which one the one to use ?
torque works (i've been running it for the last couple of years) but has quite a number of technical limitations openjpa probably works and uses an architecture more suitable for other implementations eg jackrabbit and should be quicker > How much more work need the other ? torque configuration is a complete hack but openjpa etc pretty much requires an injection container - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
