On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Norman Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > OpenJPA IMAP integration into JAMES is now complete. Its workin here > without probs and is really fast compared to the torque > implementation.
should run faster if someone took on the asynchronous IO and streamed message storage ;-) > I would be in favor to remove the whole torque implementation if > everything works out and try to get some JCR based and File (Maildir) > based MailboxManager in place. i'm not sure that having torque implementation does any harm or - given that we want multiple backends - creates much more work ATM. getting rid of torque would mean either abandoning existing IMAP users (myself included) or creating an upgrade script for torque (which would mean biting the bullet and starting to add administrative instrumentation to IMAP). so - i'm not in favour of deleting the module from IMAP but am in favour of excluding it in the james build. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
