[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980642#action_12980642
]
Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-1184:
----------------------------------------
What about the library module?
I was proposing "persistence-library" or "data-library" because here we don't
have $type.
So,
-----------------------
- data-library
- file
- jdbc
- jcr
- jpa
-----------------------
I have mixed feelings: I like short names but on the other side I don't like
the fact that the 4 modules don't have some prefix/postfix allowing me to
understand they are alternative implementations.
I will wait some day to see if we find better ideas, otherwise proceed with
this plan.
> Modules consolidation
> ---------------------
>
> Key: JAMES-1184
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1184
> Project: JAMES Server
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Build System
> Affects Versions: 3.0-M2
> Reporter: Stefano Bagnara
> Assignee: Stefano Bagnara
> Fix For: 3.0-M3
>
>
> Just opening it to keep track of the proposal to the mailing list.
> ------------
> - mail-file(3)
> - mail-jcr(1)
> - mail-jdbc(3)
> - user-jpa(4)
> - user-file(2)
> - user-jcr(2)
> - user-jdbc(4)
> - domainlist-jpa(2)
> - domainlist-xml(1)
> I only see benefits and no drawbacks in consolidating the 9 modules
> above to the following 4 modules:
> persistence-jpa(6) = user-jpa(4)+domainlist-jpa(2)
> persistence-file(6) = user-file(2)+mail-file(3)+domainlist-xml(1)
> persistence-jcr(3) = user-jcr(2)+mail-jcr(1)
> persistence-jdbc(7) = user-jdbc(4)+mail-jdbc(3)
> - mail-library(1)
> - domainlist-library(2)
> - user-library(9)
> We could consolidate them into a persistence-library module (from 3 to
> 1 module).
> persistence-library(12) =
> mail-library(1)+domainlist-library(2)+user-library(9)
> - queue-library(2)
> - queue-jms(5)
> We could merge queue-library to queue-jms (a library module makes
> sense when we do something useful.. if it is trivial stuff it can be
> duplicated or moved to the api layer).
> queue-jms(7) = queue-jms(5)+queue-library(2)
> -------------------------
> It seems there is agreement on the merging. We still have to decide whether
> to name the modules "persistence-${type}" or simply "${type}" (or maybe
> "data-${type}")
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
