Should we add this to http://james.apache.org/guidelines.html (or
somewhere else).
There's nothing special here compared to apache standard procedure, but
it's always better to say it.
Also, has all committers the privileged username/password to publish in
snahpshot/release maven repositories ?
Tks,
Eric
On 19/03/2011 08:47, Felix Knecht wrote:
Hi
Does any special 'James' documentation about releasing exists or does
it just follow the 'standard' process [1] staging a release:
1. Prepare pom for release
2. publish snapshot
3. prepare release
4. stage the release for a vote
5. vote
6. release
Does a designated release manager exists or is it up to each developer
to do it on his own (I've never done it before, so be warned in this
case ;) )?
Thanks
Felix
[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html
On 03/19/2011 05:47 AM, Eric Charles wrote:
Hi,
From http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/apache/9/apache-9.pom
apache-9 mainly specifies the maven versions to be used (for example,
the maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta3).
The versions we specify in james parent will override if needed the ones
from apache parent.
As james tend to follow close the latest versions, and if all build is
successful with parent-9, let's go for it.
Tks,
- Eric
On 18/03/2011 21:18, Felix Knecht wrote:
On 03/09/2011 01:05 PM, Felix Knecht wrote:
On 03/09/2011 12:43 PM, Eric Charles wrote:
Hi,
Just updated with Felix's last commits (r1070751).
Site are now generated with 1.6-SNAPSHOT skin.
Are there any other changes for james-project before releasing 1.6?
Shall the james-parent parent (org.apache:apache) also be updated? Now
it's version 7, latest version is 9? Does anybody knows the impacts
this could/will have?
Apart of the question above I see no other changes before releasing
1.6.
Regards
Felix
I just wonder if we should force maven-3 when using james-project 1.6
and drop the switch for site-plugin which is now done in the profiles
section.
Done.
Of course 'release early, release often' this can also be done in a
later release of the james-project.
My thoughts
Felix
Tks,
- Eric
On 9/03/2011 09:27, Norman Maurer wrote:
Looks like a left-over. "james-project" should be the correct one.
Bye,
Norman
2011/3/9 Felix Knecht<fel...@apache.org>
Ok. I also saw, that e.g. projects like mailbox have the
james-server-root
as parent, but I couldn't find a technical reason for this. When
e.g.
using
james-project as parent it builds also. Do I miss something or
is it
historically grown and maybe just a leftover?
Thanks
Felix
On 03/09/2011 09:13 AM, Norman Maurer wrote:
We should just release the parent if you think its ready...
Bye,
Norman
2011/3/9 Felix Knecht<fel...@apache.org>
On 03/09/2011 07:42 AM, Norman Maurer wrote:
We can use the SNAPSHOT until we make a release. For a release we
MUST
NOT
depend on a SNAPSHOT.
I know, but this means either a) releasing e.g. james-server-root
before
releasing mailbox or b) switch back to non SNAPSHOT version for
releasing
and using an old parent.
Is it "common" to release also james-*-parent poms when doing a
release
(sorry, probably a stupid question)?
Regards
Felix
Bye,
Norman
2011/3/9 Felix Knecht<fel...@apache.org>
On 03/08/2011 10:55 AM, Eric Charles wrote:
Hi Felix,
-site.xml descriptor is now installed.
mvn site on james-mailbox still uses 1.5 (not 1.6-SNAPSHOT).
Can version 1.6-SNAPSHOT be used instead of 1.5 in the parent
section?
What's the policy you use in this case for SNAPSHOTs for parent
poms?
Regards
Felix
Can you build with 1.6-SNAPSHOT after deleting your local
1.6-SNAPSHOT
local repo?
Tks,
- Eric
On 8/03/2011 10:20, Felix Knecht wrote:
Hi Eric
Sorry, I was not complete when saying that maven didn't
install
the
snapshots.
Yes, m3 downloads the snapshots, but if you install if from
you
local
PC
with "mvn install" to your local repo, it does not
install the
*-site.xml needed to build the sites that inherites (the
menus,...).
It's a bit complicated to explain, but if you look at
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/james/james-project/1.6-SNAPSHOT/
you will see untill Sat Mar 05 some
james-project-...-site.xml.
After, there are no more james-project-...-site.xml
because of
a m3
bug
(I suppose).
Maybe it's a feature? If I understand you right this [1]
could be
the
problem and the solution.
Does adding the attach-descriptor goal solves the problem
you're
talking about?
Thanks
Felix
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.x+Compatibility+Notes#Maven3.xCompatibilityNotes-SiteandReporting
The consequence is that when I build the sites (mailbox,
imap,...)
on
my
PC, it uses the 1.5 skin, and not the 1.6-SNAPSHOT one.
We could look if this is really a mvn bug, if a jira is
open,...
As temporary fix, we could build the james-project project
under m2,
which should fix the -site.xml deployment.
Tks,
- Eric
On 7/03/2011 16:30, Felix Knecht wrote:
Hi Eric
I temporary can't resolve a dependency from my location. I
will
try
later...
However, I remember I had issue with maven 3 beta that
didn't
install
the snapshots skins in local repo.
Is it still the case with 3.0.2 (snapshots will be
resolved,
but
I'm
curious to know if you had issues installing local
skins) ?
I removed maven-skin from local repository (rm -rf
~/.m2/repository/org/apache/james/maven-skin/) and run the
mvn site
-Psite-reports in the protocols project. The maven-skin got
downloaded, installed to local repo and used.
Technical reports may still have some inherited menus. This
is the
case when the project's parent (pom.xml) is of version 1.5
and not
of
version 1.6-SNAPSHOT. I haven't changed them because I'm
not
up to
date about your policy using SNAPSHOTs in this place. In
common
it's
not state of the art to use SNAPSHOTs.
Regards
Felix
Tks,
Eric
On 6/03/2011 06:33, Eric Charles wrote:
Hi Felix.
Great work!
I will update and try the generation with the new profile
on my
laptop.
Tks,
Eric
On 5/03/2011 20:14, Felix Knecht wrote:
A short status update:
I reviewed following projects, put them to work using
maven 3,
have
them prerequisiting mvn-3.0.2, make choosable if to
generate
documentation (mvn site as before) or to generate
technical
reports
(mvn site -Psite-reports):
- imap (imap-trunk-m2
- mailbox (
- mailbox-integration-tester
- protocols
- server
On Jenkins CI I changed configuration for these projects
to use
maven
3 (latest) and generate the site. Technical reports are
available
via
Jenkins entering the project (Maven-generated site)
or via
following
Url pattern:
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/James/job/[imap-trunk-m2|mailbox|mailbox-integration-tests|protocols-trunk|james-server-trunk]/site
I'm aware of the not working banner images in the
technical
reports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
