From http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#naming

"The primary branding for any project or product name must be in the form of "Apache Foo".
 -> it should be "Apache J...", not "J..."

"Project and product names should always be referred to in a consistent casing and used as an adjective, and never as a noun or verb, like any trademark should be used."

Tks,
- Eric


On 4/04/2011 13:29, Eric Charles wrote:
'James, An Enterprise Mail Server' sounds good to me for the server
project.
I have more questions using this baseline for the "component projects"
(mailbox, imap,...).

We probably should not worry about it and simply push what the end users
except.

See comments inline on Stefano's answer:

Q. Should we try to be consistent about letters case?
A. In our logos and in the official documentation yes, elsewhere I
don't case (lowercase is good to read).

+1

Q. Do you prefer JAMES, James or james?
A. no real preference *

No strong preference.
While documenting, I came to pages with mixed JAMES/James nomenclature
and changed aligned to James (seemed to me easier to read in the text
flow).
Also, if I read JAMES, I translate it to an acronym and will look for
the meaning of each letter: this obliges us to define that meaning
letter by letter... and will be difficult if Oracle restricts the Java
brand one day...
Imposing upper/lower letters is not easy (ask cisco who tried to fix
lower letter : they didn't follow it them selves).


Q. Do you prefer James to be explained as a name or as an acronym?
A. I prefer the acronym explanation because I don't have any "person
name" explanation that make sense.


I'm not looking always for an explanation.
A good sounding name is a good sounding name.


And now the long explanation/considerations:

Back in 2005 we had the same discussion and decided for JAMES. Then I
did all the changes around to uppercase it ;-)

I don't have a BIG personal preference for one or the other but I
agree that consistency in the official documentation is better (even
if we have cases like Sun/SUN where the two versions were widely
used).

I'm a bit in favor of the uppercase JAMES mainly because it is what we
decided in past and I don't see big reasons to change it (but maybe
after that update a lot of new "James" were introduced).

Then "James" is a person name: I wouldn't propose "Stefano" as a name
for a product, it doesn't make sense. I like the choice of
Hudson/Jenkins but they are surnames and there is a clear connection
to a famous person. So, even in the case of "James" I would think at
it as an acronym now used as a word: Italian car-makers FIAT and ALFA
are both italian acronyms but everyone read them as "words" and not
spelling it: Fiat and Alfa (then Alfa Romeo since Nicola Romeo joined
it). I would like "James" as a firstname in case we have a famous
"James Foo" inventing some email protocol or being another known
personality that influenced the email world. It would be perfect if
James Naalnish was a native american that invented the smoke signs
(unlinkely as native americans names didn't start with J).

IMHO it's like MINA: it is uppercase but no one care of what it really
means :-) Everyone read it as a word, and not spelling it.
I don't think we are forced to explain the acronym. If we fear using J
for Java can give issues then "J" could be just "JAMES" like the G in
GNU. (I don't know too much about this legal stuff, but I can't
believe Oracle "own" every word starting with "J". But in this case I
already have a plan: I'll register jbook.com and wait for facebook and
Oracle to fight each other ;-) )

Maybe we just need a better acronym explanation? I propose "JAva
MEssaging Services". So we could even write it JaMeS :-D

We often write imap and pop3 in lowercase and read them as words (in
italian we read them as italian words.. I don't expect english to read
them "i-em-a-pee" and "pee-o-pee-three", so I'm fine with using James
or james even if in the "why is it named James" documentation section
we explain it is an acronym.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to