2011/6/9 Norman Maurer <norman.mau...@googlemail.com>: > Hi there, > > its time again for the next IMAP release before we move forward and > need the new mailbox api changes. > > This release does not need any api changes from the 0.2 release. > > Changes: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&jqlQuery=project+%3D+IMAP+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%220.3%22+AND+resolution+in+%28Fixed%2C+%22Won%27t+Fix%22%2C+Duplicate%2C+Invalid%2C+Incomplete%2C+%22Cannot+Reproduce%22%2C+Later%2C+%22Not+A+Problem%22%29
In a x.y.z versioning I think we should increase "y" when adding new features. "z" should be used for minor bug fixes. So, given this includes new features I think 0.3 would have better explained this (and also we should no fear increasing numbers as we still are at 0.2 with a project that is not so "alpha" as the version number expectation). > Please review and cast your vote: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-062/ [X] +1 Go ahead Versioning is not blocking for me, but I think it would be better to follow some established convention for version numbers, in future. Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
