hi barry,

so response for your questions:

1) it should e really fast after it was calculated the first time. As
the rest just use inmemory values.
2) that really depends on your need. We ship one version that just uße
the same quota for all users.
3) It will be part of mailbox-0.3 which should get released within the
next two weeks.

bye
norman


Am Montag, 13. Juni 2011 schrieb Barry <yi....@bitrustar.com>:
> Hi Norman, cool work. I didn't  think about Max-Message for per user, it is
> very useful. But I have several issues:
>
> 1. How about it's performance? I mean the sending mail effect.
> 2. How to point quota for per user? I should put the quota in DB or other
> place?
> 3. When you release MAILBOX-64?
>
> Thanks,
> Barry
>
>
> 2011/6/13 Norman Maurer <norman.mau...@googlemail.com>
>
>> Hi Barry,
>>
>> did you see the latest changes in the mailbox project to support quotas ?
>> Maybe this would work for you ?
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX-64
>>
>> Bye,
>> Norman
>>
>> 2011/6/12 Eric Charles <eric.char...@u-mangate.com>:
>> > On 12/06/11 10:04, Barry wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Eric, I think we need to customize code and the mapping. We need the
>> >> most important feature that quota every mailbox, maybe we need to
>> >> implement a new mailet, I see there is a quota-matcher in the current
>> >> version, but it is too simple for me. and also need to do some I18N
>> >> work. could you please send me the doc in advance? I need to be familiar
>> >> with James configuration and mailet/matcher api.
>> >>
>> >> Thank you very much.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2011/6/12 Eric Charles <e...@apache.org <mailto:e...@apache.org>>
>> >>
>> >>    Hi Barry,
>> >>
>> >>    It's a matter of days for BETA1 (maybe 2 weeks, the time to have
>> >>    vote, uploads in maven, site, doc update...) - code and doc are
>> >>    available, so just a matter of doing the release.
>> >>
>> >>    You can already customize with with additional mapping... files.
>> >>    We have example for this in [1].
>> >>
>> >>    Are you thinking to other type of customization which would need
>> >>    more than configuration, I mean some API,... change in the code?
>> >>
>> >>    Tks,
>> >>    - Eric
>> >>
>> >>    [1]
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/container-spring/src/main/config/examples/META-INF/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>    On 12/06/11 07:42, Barry wrote:
>> >>
>> >>        Hi Eric,  when will you plan to release the James BETA1? the
>> >>        JPA-mailbox
>> >>        v0.2 will be still used in BETA1? because we have some specified
>> >>        requirement, we have to do some customization on JPA-mailbox,
>> >>
>> >>        Thanks,
>> >>        Barry
>> >>
>> >>        2011/6/12 Eric Charles <e...@apache.org <mailto:e...@apache.org>
>> >>        <mailto:e...@apache.org <mailto:e...@apache.org>>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>            Hi Barry,
>> >>
>> >>            Yes, you're right.
>> >>
>> >>            The documentation we will put online with the release of
>> >>        sever beta1
>> >>            will state for authorizedAddresses in smtpserver.xml
>> >>
>> >>            If you use SMTP AUTH, addresses that match those specified
>> >>        here will
>> >>            be permitted to relay without SMTP AUTH.  If you do not use
>> >> SMTP
>> >>            AUTH, and you specify addreses here, then only addresses
>> >>        that match
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org

Reply via email to